Keep knowledgeable with free updates
Merely signal as much as the Fintech myFT Digest — delivered on to your inbox.
HSBC pushed UK fintech Stenn into administration final 12 months after discovering that it had acquired a whole bunch of tens of millions of {dollars} from an internet of linked firms in nations reminiscent of Serbia, whose names usually appeared to ape these of huge, well-known companies.
London Excessive Court docket paperwork obtained by the Monetary Instances present that HSBC alleged that Stenn acquired the cash from firms with comparable names to “blue-chip firms”, reminiscent of electronics group Foxconn, however that had no connection to the bigger companies. Thousands and thousands have been additionally acquired from a enterprise solely owned by a villager in a distant area of China.
The paperwork shed new mild on the occasions resulting in the collapse of Stenn, which specialised in bill financing and as soon as boasted a $900mn valuation and partnerships with worldwide banks reminiscent of Citigroup. The knowledge raises additional questions concerning the oversight of an organization that was regulated by the Monetary Conduct Authority for anti-money laundering functions.
Stenn had its two UK models positioned into administration in December after an software to London’s Excessive Court docket from HSBC Innovation Financial institution, the previous Silicon Valley Financial institution UK which was one of many fintech’s lenders.
The FT beforehand reported {that a} reference to Stenn in a US felony indictment a couple of Russian cash laundering scheme prompted HSBC to start probing doubtlessly suspicious transactions. Stenn was not accused of wrongdoing within the case.
In a written submission to court docket, HSBC’s attorneys said that it had issued a default discover on a $35mn mortgage to Stenn after an investigation found that “funds haven’t been made by the big blue-chip firms named on the invoices”.
“As a substitute, funds have been made by firms included in nations reminiscent of Serbia which don’t have any connections to the blue-chip firms named on the invoices and incessantly fail to file any accounts earlier than being positioned into pressured liquidation by regulators,” HSBC attorneys wrote, claiming that there “might be no conceivable rationalization or justification” for the transactions.
The Serbian firms embrace companies with comparable names to Spain’s largest oil firm Repsol and Hon Hai Precision Business, the Taiwanese digital manufacturing enterprise generally generally known as Foxconn.
These Serbian companies additionally included an organization with an identical title to a Singapore-based know-how group. The businesses all had connections to 2 Serbian people named within the doc and all three firms have been positioned into “obligatory liquidation”, HSBC’s attorneys claimed within the paperwork.
“It appears extremely unlikely that the Taiwanese electronics parts producer, the Singaporean know-how firm and the Spanish multinational power and petrochemical firm would all have group firms that includes” the identical Serbian particular person as a director, HSBC’s written arguments said, noting that not one of the three giant teams appeared to even have Serbian subsidiaries.
Stenn additionally acquired funds from a “Zalando SE Restricted” included in Hong Kong, the director and shareholder of which did “not have any hyperlinks to Zalando SE” in Germany. The German on-line retailer additionally “has no operations in any way in Hong Kong”, the financial institution’s submission said.
Considered one of Zalando SE Restricted’s administrators was a director of Inexperienced Bean Buying and selling Restricted, one other Hong Kong firm that paid $1.6mn into Stenn’s financial institution accounts with Citigroup. Inexperienced Bean’s sole shareholder was a person based mostly in China’s Liaoning province.
“This tackle is positioned in what seems to be a distant village in China, consisting of very small dwellings,” in response to the financial institution’s court docket submission. “It appears unlikely {that a} respectable firm making substantial funds would have a single shareholder in a small rural village.”
HSBC alleged that Stenn’s invoicing points have been “intensive and systemic”, noting that the full worth of the invoices it had flagged in 2023 and 2024 exceeded $220mn.
Stenn didn’t oppose HSBC’s submitting and its two most important UK models have been positioned into administration the identical day. Stenn’s administrator wrote in a report earlier this month that it was conscious of “allegations regarding potential irregularities previous to insolvency”.
Stenn’s founder and chief government Greg Karpovsky was beforehand concerned in a Russian bill finance firm that later collapsed amid fraud allegations.
Karpovsky advised the FT in December that he denied “any wrongdoing in reference to Stenn”, whereas “any potential wrongdoing” in his earlier Russian enterprise was “proved to have taken place lengthy after my departure from the corporate”.
