Nationwide Client Disputes Redressal Fee (NCDRC) ne Financial institution of Baroda ke khilaaf faisla sunaaya hai. Financial institution ne ek joint account holder ko bina bataaye fastened deposit receipts (FDRs) launch kiye, jo ki “service ki kami” hai.
Case ka Background
Kamal Kumar Sajnani ne financial institution ke saath fastened deposit schemes mein paisa lagaya tha. Unka kehna hai ki yeh paisa unki private financial savings se aaya tha. Lekin, yeh fastened deposits unke aur unki spouse ke naam par bane the, kyunki Sajnani tab Spain mein reh rahe the.
Baad mein, Sajnani ka apni spouse ke saath rishta kharab ho gaya, aur unhe account ka operation badalne ka mann hua. Unhone financial institution se kaha ki dono ke signatures chahiye honge kisi bhi transaction ke liye. Iske bawajood, financial institution ne FDRs unki spouse ko de di, bina Sajnani ko inform kiye.
Grievance and Preliminary Ruling
Sajnani ne State Fee mein financial institution ke khilaaf shikayat ki, kehte hue ki financial institution ne sahi process observe nahi kiya. State Fee ne Sajnani ki baat ko kuch had tak maana aur financial institution ko Rs. 1 lakh ka high quality bharne ka hukm diya, jo unhe psychological stress aur pareshani ki wajah se diya gaya tha.
Financial institution’s Protection
Financial institution of Baroda ne kaha ki unhone sabhi authorized guidelines aur banking norms observe kiye. Unhone yeh bhi kaha ki fee “good religion” mein ki gayi thi, matlab unka maanna tha ki unhone sahi kaam kiya hai.
Ultimate Resolution by the Nationwide Fee
Ye case Nationwide Client Disputes Redressal Fee ke paas gaya, jahan NCDRC ne dekha ki financial institution ne dono joint account holders ko sahi tarike se inform nahi kiya. NCDRC ne kaha ki Sajnani ne jab signature ka request kiya tha, tab financial institution ka fail hona clear “deficiency in service” hai.
Nationwide Fee ne State Fee ke faisle ko uphold kiya aur financial institution ki attraction ko kharij kar diya.
Conclusion
Is case se yeh clear hota hai ki banks ka yeh responsibility hota hai ki wo sabhi account holders ko inform karein, khaas kar jab account operation mein modifications ki request ki jaati hai. Is case mein, Financial institution of Baroda ne sahi process observe nahi kiya, jiski wajah se yeh ruling Sajnani ke haq mein aayi.
Nationwide Client Disputes Redressal Fee (NCDRC) ne Financial institution of Baroda ke khilaaf faisla sunaaya hai. Financial institution ne ek joint account holder ko bina bataaye fastened deposit receipts (FDRs) launch kiye, jo ki “service ki kami” hai.
Case ka Background
Kamal Kumar Sajnani ne financial institution ke saath fastened deposit schemes mein paisa lagaya tha. Unka kehna hai ki yeh paisa unki private financial savings se aaya tha. Lekin, yeh fastened deposits unke aur unki spouse ke naam par bane the, kyunki Sajnani tab Spain mein reh rahe the.
Baad mein, Sajnani ka apni spouse ke saath rishta kharab ho gaya, aur unhe account ka operation badalne ka mann hua. Unhone financial institution se kaha ki dono ke signatures chahiye honge kisi bhi transaction ke liye. Iske bawajood, financial institution ne FDRs unki spouse ko de di, bina Sajnani ko inform kiye.
Grievance and Preliminary Ruling
Sajnani ne State Fee mein financial institution ke khilaaf shikayat ki, kehte hue ki financial institution ne sahi process observe nahi kiya. State Fee ne Sajnani ki baat ko kuch had tak maana aur financial institution ko Rs. 1 lakh ka high quality bharne ka hukm diya, jo unhe psychological stress aur pareshani ki wajah se diya gaya tha.
Financial institution’s Protection
Financial institution of Baroda ne kaha ki unhone sabhi authorized guidelines aur banking norms observe kiye. Unhone yeh bhi kaha ki fee “good religion” mein ki gayi thi, matlab unka maanna tha ki unhone sahi kaam kiya hai.
Ultimate Resolution by the Nationwide Fee
Ye case Nationwide Client Disputes Redressal Fee ke paas gaya, jahan NCDRC ne dekha ki financial institution ne dono joint account holders ko sahi tarike se inform nahi kiya. NCDRC ne kaha ki Sajnani ne jab signature ka request kiya tha, tab financial institution ka fail hona clear “deficiency in service” hai.
Nationwide Fee ne State Fee ke faisle ko uphold kiya aur financial institution ki attraction ko kharij kar diya.
Conclusion
Is case se yeh clear hota hai ki banks ka yeh responsibility hota hai ki wo sabhi account holders ko inform karein, khaas kar jab account operation mein modifications ki request ki jaati hai. Is case mein, Financial institution of Baroda ne sahi process observe nahi kiya, jiski wajah se yeh ruling Sajnani ke haq mein aayi.
